Source: The director of Free ilsalvagente.it
directs an "open letter" to the premier. The republished. Victor Felts
I'm sure the premier did not know the problem in its implications, some of them hidden pitfalls. Then, using to my mind as a good Samaritan, I would like to help out no end crushed by new controversies. In a few days Parliament will discuss and possibly approve - I repeat, perhaps - the cut contributions to publishing. The measure, says the government is essential because the money in cash are few and not enough. In short, sacrifices were imposed on anyone and it would be absurd not to be imposed even in newspapers and magazines. The reasoning goes smoothly. One area in need
practical result. A special sector and already in trouble as ours (a fall in sales, advertising symmetric to the economic crisis, higher costs), from next year will have water in my throat. Patience. Who will have the strength to survive float, the other will die. It is cruel, but there is nothing to be done: we are not bankers and we must adhere to rules of the market. We never complained and we do not even now, plus it would not be the moment, with the problems facing the Italians.
A "but" called Mondadori
But there is a but. And on this point, Berlusconi must open your ears and listen. Its staff, in preparing the text on the cuts, you want to distraction want to please the big boss, they forgot to include in the list of businesses to suffer one of the big boss himself, that is, Mondadori. Aye. Look at 'when you say coincidence. Certainly the beloved Knight without fear and without blemish ignore this particular odious that could adversely (...) a lot of trouble, such as the accusation, in fact documented conflict of interest. For a prime minister author with its experts on a bill that reduces funding to the newspapers, except for its journals, does not merely make a figure of shit, but is exposed to the arrows of the opposition so far remained inactive due to lack of motivation. Even
IlSole24Ore ...
It gets worse. The rules in the process of scrutinizing the House and Senate contain other glaring inequities of the suspect, it could be voluntary. In addition to Mondadori, were excluded from tightening the Sun and the Future 24 hours, respectively, the official organs of the Confindustria and the CEI (Italian Episcopal Conference). Sounds like a joke as a priest. You take away the food in any national publication except three giants many expressions of unlimited power than strong: Berlusconi, the industrial and the Church. The laws are respected when they are the same for everyone. Instead what we are talking about is true for almost everyone. Why? If I left I would not doubt that Silvio is in favor of each cut away from his pockets, because the industry is best to keep them good or I'll speak out against it, because the priests would recommend them to you: if you take away the grain might be revenge, and every man for himself. Since, conversely, are not left to say Knight is not open to such criticism and to change rules so unjust as idiotic. Because he probably is not familiar with the matter in debating you, provide useful information to avoid the direct and indirect trappole.Silvio Berlusconi
should know that the contributions to publishing (allocated from the same country) are of two types: direct and indirect. Well, those are the subject of direct review. Indirect (which takes advantage Mondadori, industrial and bishops) do not touch, not even taken into esame.In What are the indirect contributions? I will explain now, illustrious Presidente.Allora, companies mentioned (and others), rather than spreading through newsstands, subscriptions link postal cost a tot. Here, the tot at the end of the year is paid by the State (which picks up from the bottom of publishing) the extent of fifty per cento.Poiché Mondadori, the Sun and the Future 24 hours ship every week (or every week), hundreds of thousands of "pieces", the aggregate amount of the benefits guaranteed to them colossale.Va is saying that the three companies concerned, if they had more support from the public money, perhaps they should not be completely to the dogs, but risk going there, exactly as the newspapers that his government - you - he sawed direct contributions. Confident in his honesty, esteemed President, Please accept my suggestion inspired by the sense of justice.
Cut the contributions to their newspapers
should cut? Cut all contributions to newspapers, including his and those of powerful rich people. Or do not cut anything. We split the press in children and stepchildren is a shameful operation. Finally, a question: does the law foresees 120 million a year to be shared between local television stations. I'm happy. But it would be appropriate to confess because she did not dare to file this sum.
0 comments:
Post a Comment